NoCouncilTax.com
Consigning Council Tax To The History Books!
Investigation launched into Freedom Rebels Gloucester Court Council Tax Video
In: Council Lies| Councils| Gloucester| News
29 Jun 2010The Freedom Rebels have allegedly recorded a court hearing … THIS IS IT!
According to a local Gloucester Newspaper an allegedly illegal recording of a case at Gloucester Magistrates’ Court has been posted on the internet. (oh dear!)
The video was uploaded by a group calling itself The Freedom Rebels.
It shows a hearing which the group says took place on Friday, January 29, this year.
Making a recording in court is illegal under Section 41 of the Criminal Justice Act 1925 and under Section nine of the Contempt of Court Act 1981.
Anyone breaking the law can be jailed.
A police spokeswoman said: “Gloucester CID are currently investigating the filming of this footage.
“The court service are aware and we are liaising with them.”
The video has been uploaded to a well-known video sharing website.
It shows magistrates sitting in court two in the Barbican Way complex hearing a case regarding unpaid council tax.
The Freedom Rebels group claims to work to challenge what it calls the “false authority” of the courts.
Its members also believe council tax is illegal under British common law and are campaigning to see it abolished.
Videos of other court hearings, including at Cwmbran Magistrates’ Court, have also been uploaded onto the internet.
The law states: “It is a contempt of court to use in court, or bring into court for use, any tape recorder or other instrument for recording sound, except with the leave of the court or to publish a recording of legal proceedings made by means of any such instrument, or any recording derived directly or indirectly from it, by playing it in the hearing of the public.”
For Those who haven’t seen the video as yet …
- Where HAVE you been?
- Click Here - http://vimeo.com/channels/freedom
So much for recycling: Plymouth Council Binmen caught emptying ‘green’ bin and ordinary rubbish into the SAME lorry!!
In: Council Lies| Councils| News| Plymouth Council
19 Jun 2010This is the moment binmen were caught on camera emptying a recycling bin and one with ordinary rubbish into the SAME lorry.
Residents could not believe their eyes when they saw council employees wheeling the refuse containers towards the dump truck.
One person had time to grab their camera and took this image of a brown and a green bin being emptied into the vehicle.
And residents claim the practice has now been going on in Plymouth, Devon, for six weeks.
What a waste: Council workers look on as the two bins are emptied into the back of the same lorry
One man, who did not want to be named, said residents decided to take action after they complained to the council and received no response.
He said: ‘They just come along and get both bins and put them in the same truck. We wash our bottles and tins and we want them to be recycled.
‘It’s a waste of time if they are putting them in the same truck as the unrecyclable waste.
‘We saw it happen for the first time and thought it was a one-off, but now we have seen it again and again.’
The pictures were taken as the contracted refuse workers did their round in a service lane behind residents’ houses on Wednesday morning.
Those living on the street say they all adhere to the council’s recycling policy and are upset because they want to see the recyclable material kept separate.
They claim the same thing had happened on the past three green-and-brown bin collections, despite making complaints to the Plymouth City Council.
A female resident, who also asked to remain anonymous, took pictures of the incident and described what she saw as ‘terrible’.
She said: ‘I have always washed and separated out all my recyclable waste, but I’m not going to recycle any more until I am sure that the council is recycling it properly.’
She added that the council might say it was difficult to get lorries through – but if they could get one lorry through, they could get both a waste wagon and a recycling lorry in, she argued.
Plymouth City Council said that a ’significant proportion’ of the green bins in the service lane had been contaminated with non-recyclable waste.
Therefore, in line with council policy, they were reclassified as ‘unrecyclable’ and emptied into a ‘brown’ refuse truck, a spokesman said.
‘A significant proportion of the green bins had also been “contaminated” with non-recyclable waste, so they were emptied into the same truck,’ he said.
‘Vehicles have been blocking access for our refuse and recycling trucks and we have had problems emptying the bins in this road for a number of weeks.
‘This meant there was a considerable build-up of rubbish and we received several complaints from residents that green and brown bins were overflowing.
‘Access was still blocked on Wednesday so we sent a crew in a smaller lorry to clear the rubbish as quickly as possible.
‘We can assure residents that they can keep up their excellent recycling efforts safe in the knowledge that it is all contributing to reducing landfill and creating a cleaner environment.’
Credit: http://www.freedomrebels.co.uk/members/profile/64/blog-view/blog_734.html
This just in from one of our “whistleblowers” inside a Council in the East Of England.
For reasons of protecting the identity of our “source” we have removed any reference that could lead to him/her
I started working in the council tax department in 2007. After a training period of around 4 months i was considered trained to a sufficient standard, and was let loose.
I noticed immediately the attitude of 90% of my co-workers. It was very negative. Typically, they were very confrontational with the tax payers, the people we were employed to help (allegedly).
It quickly became quite clear that the behaviour of the council tax machine was infkuenced by one thing: collection rates.
Its worth noting that the target rate is around 99%. In fact, its probably worth noting a few things at this point:
- there are 8 bands of council tax, A-H, H being the highest
- A= £950 pa, B= £1120 pa, C= 1300 pa D= £1450 and so on
In the time that I’ve been there, i’ve learned a lot.
I’ve learned several ways that people shoot themselves in the foot, and i’ve learned the ways that people can avoid paying, and often get away with it.
- If you’ve applied for any type of housing or council tax benefit in the financial year, you have inadvertantly agreed to pay council tax. not nice, but now you know. Always read the small print.
- When you receive your council tax bill for the forthcoming financial year, if it does not include a little booklet (usually A5) the bill is not valid.
- For any bill to be valid, it needs to be considered as ’served’. Returned mail is not considered ’served’.
- Like it or not, council tax is actually due in full on 01 April every year, as per the Local Government Finance Act 1992. Councils offer a monthly installment scheme as advised by central goverment.
- Once you start paying for any financial year, you’ve already accepted the services being offered, so if you dont want to pay, dont pay at all. Look up ‘deemed contracts’ – similar thing.
- If you get summoned to court, the summons is only considered served if it not returned to the council. If the summons is returned to the council, it is invlalid, and no court hearing will go ahead. Very simple.
- No court hearing = no enforcement, AT ALL.
- once a court hearing goes ahead, the council are obliged to collect the money by any means: bailiff, attachment of earnings, charging order – i can expand on these at length if you want me to.
I dont agree with any of the above, but i do know a lot about it, so i invite you to use my knowledge as a resource. If its council tax related, i’ve done it. If its bailiff questions, I probbly know the answer. If you need to know about how the council trace you, I know this too. I know what will work, and what wont and am happy to share my knowledge with you.
“We will be bringing you a lot more from our source and its surprising now how many good people there are in the councils who are now coming forward and talking to us – thanks again to our source for this intro”
If you are a Council Employee and you are fed up with the way that Councils abuse the rest of us then I encourage you to come forward – drop us line here at the site by adding a comment to a post – we wont publish it – but we will contact you and rest assured your identity, if you choose to give it, will remain secret at all times.
Watch this space – this is going to get exciting and we are going to learn the real truth – from the inside!
Admin
- (13) Comments
- Tags: Attachment of Earnings, Corrupt Councils, Corrupt Officials, Council Dirty Tricks, Council Tax, Council Tax Bailiffs, Council Tax Bands, council Tax Rebels, Council Whistleblowers, Debt Collection, Freedom Rebels, FreedomRebels.co.uk, Local Government Finance Act 1992, ray st.clair, raymond St.Clair, TPUC.org
Thousands of Whitehall mandarins saw their bonuses soar by up to 20 per cent last year.
That was despite repeated pledges by ministers to crack down on public sector profligacy.
And it follows yesterday’s astonishing revelation that there are 172 senior civil servants who earn over £150,000 – more than the Prime Minister.
In total, civil servants in Government departments were given bonuses worth nearly £130million – the equivalent of £2 for every man, woman and child in Britain.
A survey by the Daily Mail has found that more than half of the departments paid higher rewards to civil servants than the year before.
Bureaucrats in the Foreign Office were among the biggest beneficiaries, with an 18 per cent hike in the total value of bonuses in just one year.
Staff in the Equalities Office – the former pet department of Labour’s acting leader Harriet Harman – saw their bonus pots double in just 12 months.
The shocking examples of Whitehall excess come as a civil service union chief claimed that the pay and perks of senior mandarins were ‘modest’.
Jonathan Baume, leader of the First Division Association that represents senior staff, also made a thinly veiled attack on David Cameron, suggesting that the Prime Minister could afford a pay cut because he was a ‘millionaire’.
Mr Baume was responding to Business Secretary Vince Cable, who had urged ‘more discipline’ in public sector pay following the disclosure over civil servants’ vast pay.
The Government has Whitehall’s bonus culture in its sights as part of plans to cut Britain’s eye-watering deficit by more than £6billion.
But in an extraordinary defence, Mr Baume said: ‘These are relatively high salaries compared to the average but they are modest in most cases compared to the private sector. They are the jobs at the very top of an enormous organisation operating across the UK.’
Asked about comparisons to the Prime Minister’s salary, he said: ‘David Cameron himself is a millionaire and I’ve got absolutely no issue with that but prime ministers, even if he wasn’t, generally go on to become very rich afterwards – that’s certainly been the case of the last three, four prime ministers.’
The Mail used the Freedom of Information Act to ask all departments how much they had paid civil servants in bonuses for the past two years. Figures were released by seven ministries.
They showed that staff at the Government Equalities Office, the Department for International-Development, and the Welsh Office saw the value of their packages more than double.
At the Foreign Office the amount soared by 18 per cent. Only the Department for Work and Pensions, the Department of Communities and Local Government, and the Department of Health saw their bonuses fall.
The survey suggests that this tax year bonuses to civil servants will exceed the £129million paid between 2008 and 2009.
The Foreign Office paid out by far the most in bonuses with a pot of £9.1million in 2009-10, up from £7.7million the year before, a rise of 18 per cent. This works out at an average of almost £1,250 each for the 7,303 who got the bonuses.
High earners: Bureaucrats in the Foreign Office were among the most highly paid
The Equalities Office paid out £58,850, up from £28,400, a rise of 107 per cent. Of this, £19,000 was allocated for staff who have ‘excelled in a particular area of work’ – although 30 members of the discrimination law team were given £100 for the apparently everyday task of helping to process the controversial Equality Act through Parliament.
At the Welsh Office, the value of bonuses rose from £6,000 to £15,900.
The Department of Communities and Local Government paid out less than the year before, £1.1million compared to £1.2million. However, the amount staff received went up from an average of £1,911 to £2,024.
The Department for International Development showered bonuses across the ministry, even giving 13 security guards employed by private contractor ISS Pegasus £500 each.
In total DfID paid out £634,150 to senior civil servants, down from £641,510, with the largest single payment being £15,000 and the average payment £7,357.
However, for the first time the department rewarded middle-ranking civil servants with a new bonus which amounted to £742,515. In total the department paid out £1.3million – a rise of 103 per cent.
The Department for Work and Pensions paid out £21.81million, down from £23.32million the year before.
The Department of Health paid out £2,367,000 in bonuses for 1,017 staff, down from £2,605,000 the year before.
Last night the Equalities Office said its bonuses were for staff ‘receiving an achieved or excelled mark in their annual reports’. The Foreign Office said it ‘targets money at those who make the biggest contribution’ while DfID said it always took into account the difficulty of workers’ tasks when deciding payouts.
The survey does not include some of the biggest bonus-paying departments. The Ministry of Defence gave out £53million in 2008/9 and will reportedly increase that by another £6million for the year just gone.
Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: ‘It is small wonder that the public finances are in such an awful mess if people were getting record bonuses despite all the things going wrong.
‘It is unbelievable that any minister could have thought it appropriate to hand out wads of cash at a time when the economy and the public finances were in a dire state.’
The PM and his new ministers have already cut their own pay by 5 per cent.
THE HOUSING FAT CATS
High earner: Former chief executive of the Anchor Trust John Belcher
More than 50 housing association ‘fat cats’ are pocketing more than the Prime Minister in pay and perks, it emerged yesterday.
A list of the top-paid executives – who are supposed to find homes for the poorest in society – was released yesterday as part of a Government transparency drive.
John Belcher, the former chief executive of the Anchor Trust, was the top paid housing boss last year, earning £391,000 – including a £111,000 bonus.
His salary rocketed by 85 per cent in five years even though he oversaw the closure of a string of care homes.
Housing associations are largely funded by taxpayers’ money.
Michael Gelling, from the Tenants’ and Residents’ Organisation of England, said it was ‘difficult to justify how money for housing benefit is going towards those enormous salaries.’
The £18,000 council job you can’t apply for if you are white!
In: Bristol City Council| Councils| News| Racist Councils| Topics
2 Jun 2010A council has been accused of discrimination after white people were barred from applying for two £18,000-a-year jobs.
Bristol City has created the management training posts for graduates in an effort to recruit more minority employees.
As a result the council will only accept applications from ethnic minorities for the two-year placements.
But this has prompted criticism from white graduates struggling to find work.
Controversial: Bristol City Council has attracted criticism from white jobseekers who claim the management trainee posts are ‘totally racist’
One jobseeker, who did not wish to be named, described the posts as ‘totally racist’.
He said: ‘I am a tolerant white person who has lived in Bristol for 27 years.
‘I am searching for a job and stumbled across a job advertisement on Bristol City Council’s website that I see as totally racist.
‘I feel the job would be an excellent opportunity for me to make use of the skills and qualifications that I have acquired but, being white, I am excluded.
‘Equal opportunities means giving everyone an equal chance to succeed rather than discriminating against people because of the colour of their skin.’
The two jobs are described on BCC’s website as ‘open to black and minority ethnic graduates’ only, with applications closing on June 11.The job description reads: ‘We are looking for two enthusiastic graduates with a degree in any discipline to undertake a two-year management training programme at Bristol City Council.
‘You should have a strong interest in the delivery of local public services, be able to take the initiative and have the confidence to relate to people at all levels within the Council.
‘The traineeship will involve rotating placements in different services of the City Council where you will be where you will be given ‘on the job’ training and undertake projects including policy and research work.
‘You will need to be flexible and able to learn quickly in changing environments. The successful candidates will be offered a postgraduate diploma in Management Studies, a tax free training allowance and mentoring and support throughout the traineeship.’
Bristol council has 9,000 members of staff, not including teachers, of which 630, or seven per cent, are from ethnic minorities.
Because 12 per cent of Bristol residents come from minority backgrounds the council has begun trying to redress this imbalance.
Discriminatory? The job advert appeared on Bristol City Council’s website
A spokesman for the council said advertising ethnic minority-only posts was allowed under race relations legislation.
He said: ‘This traineeship was started because of the marked under-representation of ethnic minorities in our workforce.
‘The normal recruitment process was not rectifying this unacceptably low trend so there was a strong case for this small positive recruitment traineeship for two ethnic minority graduates a year.
‘We have a workforce of more than 9,000 employees, excluding school staff, so this is a small training programme.
‘Graduates from any ethnic background are open to apply for the national graduate local government programme which we recruit from every year – we have just recruited two graduates in this way.
‘We also run a successful apprenticeship programme for the under-24s – so far we have placed 62 to date. And of course there are a range of jobs advertised externally via our website, which graduates can apply for.
‘It is also worth remembering that this is a training position – at the end of the two years there is no guarantee of work and the successful candidates would have to apply for a job with the council in the usual way on the open market.’
The Race Relations Act 1976 states that if a racial group is under-represented councils can offer training to individuals from that group.
Human beings have been washing their hands since time began and Mobile phones have been around for nearly two generations. It is hard to think of anyone who doesn’t have one, but just in case they do still confuse you, West Sussex County Council decided to lend a helping hand.
They produced videos called ‘How to wash you hands properly” and ‘How to use a mobile phone’. Carefully going through how to make a call, send a text and save your favourite numbers, they put it up on the web last year.
They say that they ran 23 courses last year for 160 people wanting to learn how to use a basic mobile phone, and the film was made in order to promote the courses and ensure it reached more people.
But local residents who spoke to Watchdog questioned whether it really was an effective use of public money.
West Sussex County Council made the video, along with other such as ‘How to use a map and compass’ . They say that all of the films only cost a few hundred pounds each to make, and insist they are effective publicity and represent good value for money.
You can decide for yourself by looking at the film, and their full response, below.
At a time when saving money is top of the agenda across local and central government, Watchdog had a look at how West Sussex and other local councils are spending taxpayers’ money. The full report can be seen tonight at 8pm on BBC1.
West Sussex County Council told Watchdog:
‘Each film cost just £300 to make, from existing budgets. Last year we ran 23 courses for 160 people wanting to learn how to use a basic mobile phone. The film, to promote the courses, ensured we reached even more people. It was taken off when attendances were extremely high. We also run popular silver surfer courses for the many older people who also want to learn internet technology.
How to Wash your Hands’ was made at the height of the H1N1 virus as a health protection video, using special light to show that many people simply don’t do it properly.
Our in-house films are also on DVD and shown at Libraries and Help Points. The camera and editing equipment has earned more in income than it cost to buy. This is effective publicity and good value for money.’
What flipping planet do these people live on! Think about it – over a billion mobile phones sold and West Sussex County Council believe that we need a £300 video to tell us how to use one! Good God!
Nice to know that our money is being wasted in this way – thanks to BBC watchdog for alerting us on this one!
Once again the fight was to be taken up against the opressive and fraudulent machine that is GLOUCESTER CITY COUNCIL.
For the first time I would be standing as the lay representative for Muchlyjip in her attempt to get this Council to provide the information we have requested.
As we all assembled close to the Courthouse in Gloucester and went over a few more details, finalised the process I planned to use and generally got ourselves together we (Myself, Rhapsody Angel, Pigdog, Muchlyjip, and Muchlyjip’s son) were joined by MJ, Telelite and another for a reasonable turnout and a lot of support.
9:20 soon came about and as our case was supposed to be at 9:30 we made our way to the courthouse, we turned the corner to find that there was an enormous queue to enter, it turns out to be because the security guards had been given orders to remove ALL electronic devices including all phones, ipods, cameras etc. and later we found out that it was the Clerk in Muchlyjips case that specifically ordered this!!! Could it be that they didn’t want film of the event getting out again???
Eventually we managed to get inside and we reported to the reception desk, after Muchlyjip had confirmed that the legal fiction was there I asked to enter some documentation into court in the case and was promptly refused by a particularly surly and fatuous woman who seemed to be the head honcho of the ushers, (Sort of an ugly Hitler in a dress!!!), Anyway, they didn’t let me enter anything in to evidence even though this would have cleared a few things up for them.
As this was the first time I had stood for anyone I must admit I was more than a little nervous and as a result was perhaps not as up to speed on my reactions to this bulldozing method of justice that they were clearly employing here, and as a result missed a trick or two, however, we live AND LEARN!
There followed a two hour wait, yes once again we’re invited to appear at a certain time, we honour it and they just ignore all manners and business etiquette and keep us waiting.
Finally Muchlyjip is called and we file through to Court 1 (Same as when we appeared for Rhapsody in the Video!!!!), I claimed Common Law Jurisdiction and stated that we were entering the ‘Vessel’ with all our inalienable and indefeasible rights intact and we entered.
The first thing I noticed was that there was only one Maggie on the bench this time, there were also two policyofficers already sitting down in the courtroom, I informed the Maggie and the Clerk that I was a lay Advisor to the Legal fiction that they were seeking and that the Legal Fiction Person was indeed present in the court, however the Maggie just shouted over me and continued to demand that the Clerk bark a request for that ‘person’ to enter court 1over the Tannoy.
I thought to myself that this was a deliberate attempt to fluster me and in some way acheive jurisdiction, I took a breath and waited for the Maggie to take a breath and then proceeded on regardless, I then placed her on her oath, deliberately reading in a calm and measured way, trying to complete the sentences as calmly as I could despite a rising cresendo from the Maggie trying to shout over me!!!
Once I had placed her on her oath she told me that she didn’t have to produce her oath at all and that if I interupted (Me interupt her??????) then she would have me removed from the court, I replied that “with respect I am simply trying to ascertain her jurisdiction as is my right”, she continued to shout, only this time as I produced the Birth Certificate and informed her that (in a calm and measured voice again) “This is the ‘Legal Fiction Person’ You are seeking” she shouted that unless I stopped shouting ( I know, classic psychological manipulation, she assumed that if she shouted that loud enough then the assumption by all those present would be that I was actually shouting!) she would have me removed, all the time this was happening Mr Deveraux (Yes him again folks!!!!) kept trying to put the case against the legal fiction person but couldn’t be heard.
Finally the Maggie decided that she’d had enough and stated that she would hear the case without Ms S***** present, I once again assured her that the ‘Legal Fiction Person’ was present, I held up the Birth Certificate again and then stated that “For and on the record as the Magistrate would not stand on her oath I was the highest authority in the court and had no choice but to dissmiss the case and the court!” She shouted again and then ordered the Policy officers to remove us from the court room.
I attempted to place these two glorified court ushers on their oath too, they read it but then told me that they didn’t care whether I had their oath with me or not and that I couldn’t hold them to it, I assured them that I could and that I was going to regardles and that we were leaving peacefully and of our own free will.
There followed twenty minutes of queueing again to retreive our confiscated property before we made our way out again.
As we walked to the nearest hostelry for refreshments Oop6 introduced himself to us, we had seen this man inside, he had seemed to be taking a lot of notes in a notebook and we had speculated that he was a reporter or something but it turns out he was gleening a lot of useful information for us as they didn’t know who he was either!!!!
Anyways, once again we were short changed by the system, they refused to have any kind of dialogue with us as to the Lawful process or anything other than running roughshod over us.
Once we can get to the point that we are not actually refusing to pay this Tax we just want them to clarify where it’s going and that we as Human living sentient souls are liable for it before we do, then we can progress, I think until we get to that point we’ll just get to the same unsatisfactory end.
I just want to say a big thanks to all those that turned up for Muchlyjip, the Gloucester Group is getting bigger and better, stronger and faster all the time, we’re looking forward to the next meeting (16th May) at which we will be discussing this and other cases, having a few ales and generally being as free as we can while we can.
I would also like to give a special shout to the guys from Worcester, MJ, Oop6 and mostly my wonderful partner, lifeforce and inspiration Sarah (Rhapsody Angel) for poking me in the ribs and whispering “Put em on their Oath, Put em on their Oath!!!!” incessantly while all the confusion was happening.
Courtesy of CAPTAIN SCARLETT (www.FreedomRebels.co.uk Moderator)
Credit: http://www.freedomrebels.co.uk/magazine/read/freeman-in-gloucester-court-30th-april-2010_573.html
Chichester District Council Confronts Rebels Tearing Up The Council Tax Hearings …
In: Chichester District Council| Councils| Courts| Police| Sussex County Council| Sussex Police
26 Apr 2010In May 2009 Graeme Delglyn wrote to Chichester District Council agreeing to pay Council Tax what he lawfully owed upon the following conditions:
1. Proof of claim that there existed a lawfully binding, bilateral contract that met the four essential conditions of such a contract.
2. Proof of claim that Graeme: of the Delglyn Family, actually consented, in writing.
3. Proof of claim that Graeme: of the Delglyn Family, was in any way bound by the jurisdiction of Chichester District Council
4. Proof of claim that Graeme: of the Delglyn Family had no lawful remedy in Article 61 of Magna Carta.
The reply from the CDC dated 3 June 2009 ignored every point raised and referred to some accounting errors. During July 2009 a COUNCIL TAX REMINDER NOTICE was received indicating that recovery action would be taken unless prompt payment was made.
On the 4th of August Graeme: of the Delglyn Family wrote back to CDC stating that the CDC had not replied to his original letter within the stipulated 7 day period and that the CDC was in estoppel. Also that no further correspondence should be entered into and that CDC must now address all correspondence to Graeme: of the Delglyn Family rather than the legal fiction MR GRAEME DELGLYN.
On 11 August 2009 CDC resent a copy of their letter dated 3 June 2009 believing …”this now clarifies the situation.”
Further correspondence was entered into between Graeme: of the Delglyn Family and the CDC. As Graeme: of the Delglyn Family served notice to the CDC that the name GRAEME DELGLYN and all derivatives was now in copyright/ Between September 2009 and November 2009 the CDC addressed correspondence to Graeme: of the DELGLYN FAMILY, before flagrantly breaching copyright and reverting to . MR GRAEME DELGLYN thereafter. (notice the DOT in front of the name!)
On 7 April CDC wrote to . MR GRAEME DELGLYN (why the dot preceding MR?) stating that a total of £3451.15 was now payable of which £1641.45 was subject to court proceedings.
On 24 March 2010 a SUMMONS FOR NON-PAYMENT OF COUNCIL TAX was sent to the legal fiction . GRAEME DELGLYN together with a covering letter signed by David Bathurst the Sussex Magistrates’ Courts Committee giving until the hearing on 20 April 2010 to pay or …”the Magistrates will be requested to issue a Liability Order against you.” (Notice the use of the word ‘requested’).
The ‘summons’ issued was without the Royal Seal or a ‘wet’ signature and thus a unlawful (or fraudulent?) document.
Graeme: of the Delglyn Family rebutted this summons delivering it to the Chichester Magistrates Court together with e NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF PAPERWORK. A copy of this document was also delivered by hand to the CDC, together with a SCHEDULE OF FEES. No reply was made by either party.
On 20 April 2010 Graeme of the Delglyn Family together with Raymond of the St Clair Family and six witnesses arrived at the Chichester Magistrates Court to keep an appointment on behalf of the legal fiction MR GRAEME DELGLYN.
On arriving they proceeded to the reception desk to notify their arrival. When asked if one of us was MR GRAEME DELGLYN Raymond: of the St Clair Family stated that he was there as a third party to assist the court in settlement and closure of this account.
The Magistrates did not honour their appointment and the party was kept waiting for half an hour.
When the Magistrates entered the court room to commence proceedings, the Clerk of Court instructed “All rise!” The 6 witnesses remained seated.
When the Magistrates invited the legal fiction MR. GRAEME DELGLYN into the court room, Raymond of the St Clair Family requested that we entered into the room with all our inalienable Common Law rights intact. This request was ignored by the Magistrates and Raymond of the St Clair Family repeated his request. Still no reply so Raymond of the St Clair Family and Graeme: of the Delglyn Family entered the room stating that entry was made “with all our inalienable Common Law rights intact.”
The legal representative of the council, Mrs Robinson, a young and clearly inexperienced lady read through her statement detailing what amounts were unpaid and that correspondence has been returned to the CDC with ‘Return to Sender – No Contract’ written on the envelope. What Mrs Robinson failed to state was that the envelope also had a sticker on the reverse stating “Whistlebowers wanted. Are you fed up with the way your company or organisation treats people then contact us on freedomrebels@gmail.com”
Her oath? Raymond : of the St Clair Family requested a Mrs Robinson for a copy of her oath ….
The Magistrates then turned to ask if Mr. GRAEME DELGLYN was present. Raymond: of the St Clair Family replied stating that he was acting as authorised and duly contracted agent for the legal fiction MR GRAEME DELGLYN in this matter. The Magistrates asked if MR GRAEME DELGLYN was present. Raymond: of the St Clair Family replied that the legal fiction MR GRAEME DELGLYN was present and displayed the Birth Certificate - Raymond: of the St Clair Family then addressed the Magistrates stating:
“Under God, so help me God. That was your Oath. I accept your Oath and I acknowledge it. And I hold you to that Oath, and now we have a binding contract. You are sworn to serve and protect me, and I appointed you to your office, in these affairs, to uphold all my indefeasible Rights, and to protect me from the criminal conversion of the civil statutes of the State of England. Are you prepared to do that, or to recuse yourselves?”
The head Magistrate tried to prevent him from continuing without success and then tried to shout him down. At this point the Clerk of Court suggested they leave the court. Graeme: of the Delglyn Family asked if they were abandoning the court. The clerk of the court said “No”.
After a short break the Magistrates returned and tried to recommence proceedings by trying to establish whether MR GRAEME DELGLYN was present. Raymond: of the St Clair Family held up the legal fiction (birth certificate) and declare that MR GRAEME DELGLYN was indeed present.
The magistrates were non-plussed and looked to the Clerk of Court for guidance. The Clerk of Court threatened to call the police. Raymond: of the St Clair Family instructed one of the witnesses to call the police immediately as the Magistrates were not prepared to prove their oath.
Before the police arrived the Court Security moved to escort Raymond: of the St Clair Family out of the room. They were politely told that they would be liable for Common Law assault if they touched anyone. They understood, moved away and acted in an exemplary manner thereafter.
When the police constables arrived Raymond: of the St Clair Family and Graeme: of the Delglyn Family left the room with them to explain that there was no breach of the peace and that they were merely exercising their lawful right to establish that the Magistrates were indeed what they claimed to be before any discussion could take place. Graeme: of the Delglyn Family explained that in their place of business it was inexcusable for Magistrates not to evidence their qualifications or license. At all times the police constables acted in an exemplary manner and within Common Law.
All parties then entered into the courtroom and the Magistrates once again tried to establish whether MR GRAEME DINNEN was indeed in the court room.
Raymond: of the St Clair Family continued to request whether the Magistrates were recusing themselves. He also pointed out that the Fairness in courts and tribunals (July 2004) stated that courts must “get names and modes of address correct by asking parties how they wished to be addressed” and that repeatedly asking Graeme: of the Delglyn Family if he was MR GRAEME DELGLYN was in breach of their code of practice.
The police asked if Raymond: of the St Clair Family would speak with them privately outside. He agreed.
The Magistrates once again asked if MR GRAEME DELGLYN was present. Graeme: of the Delglyn Family held up the Birth Certificate stating clearly that MR GRAEME DELGLYN was indeed present. As the Magistrates rose to leave the room once again one of the witnesses stood and declared “I can confirm that MR GRAEME DELGLYN is present in the court as can be seen from that piece of paper that has just been shown to you”. The Magistrates then left the room.
For about 10 minutes the Magistrates were out of the room. Graeme: of the Delglyn Family addressed the witnesses explaining that the reason for them running from their oaths was because this mockery was not a properly convebed court. The CDC has merely issued their own Summons (perjury and breach of the Administration of Justice Act), rented a room in a court building to give the illusion of a court room (more deception) and had paid the salaries of the Magistrates and Clerk of Court for the day. It was a Council Tax rubber stamping exercise and was clearly not lawful.
Graeme: of the Delglyn Family also explained to the witnesses that the Magistrates would in any case issue a Liability Order because that is all they know to do. But in fact no Liability Order will be issued, only the threat of one because only courts can issue Liability Orders and this wasn’t by any description or definition a court.
The Magistrates returned and stated that as Mr GRAEME DELGLYN was not present they would issue a Liability Order. They then left the room to execute that.
Graeme: of the Delglyn Family stated that for the record that the Magistrates and Clerk of Court were Public Servants and that he, Graeme: of the Delglyn Family was a Member of the Public and therefore the highest authority in the courtroom AND that the case was dismissed. Graeme: of the Delglyn Family instructed the Clerk of the Court for and on the record to record that. The Clerk of Court replied that he didn’t have to do that. Graeme: of the Delglyn Family explained that there were witnesses.
As the case was dismissed Graeme: of the Delglyn Family and the witnesses departed from the courtroom. As one witness exited, the noticed the Magistrates had returned and were asking if the defendant had abandoned the court. For the defendant to abandon the court, that defendant had to be present in the first place.
By the end of the day the CDC and the Magistrates were guilty of conspiracy to defraud, dereliction of duty, deception, obstruction, perjury, treason and wasting police time.
At no stage did the Magistrates or Clear of the Court take the Birth Certificate to inspect it.
A VIDEO OF THIS UNLAWFUL COURT FARCE IS TO FOLLOW …
www.NoCouncilTax.com is back!!
In: News
10 Apr 2010Yes! www.NoCouncilTax.comThe site that has become the bane of every council in the land is back!
We’re now even bigger, brighter and better than before with a completely new look and a much faster server to take care of all the traffic! (much of which was councils themselves wondering how the hell they were going to try and cover up what we were exposing)
What’s even more encouraging is that we now have not 1 but THREE, yes 3 whistleblowers working inside corrupt county councils who are telling us and showing us exactly whats going on.
These are brave people and its becoming clear to us the councils treat their employees the same way the treat everyone else … like dirt! Now some of them are realising that they are not alone, that they like us have to care for their families and live in the community and that what the councils are doing in forcing people to pay this Council Tax unlawfully is wrong. We applaud those who have come forward and actively encourage many more of you to tell us your stories. We guarantee your anonymity!
So bookmark the site, stand back, and enjoy the show!
Regards; Admin
About this blog
Welcome to NoCouncilTax.com the only site dedicated to the wholesale eradication of the most unjust and corrupt system of taking money off ordinary people ever concieved - Council Tax! - We have made it our mission to expose councils involved in the Council Tax Currption and show You where the money really goes - Above all we will together prove its unlawful and consign it to the history books!
Photostream
Categories
- Articles (2)
- Councils (8)
- Bristol City Council (1)
- Chichester District Council (1)
- Gloucester (2)
- Plymouth Council (1)
- Sussex County Council (2)
- WhistleBlowers (1)
- Courts (3)
- News (8)
- Council Corruption (1)
- Council Dirty Tricks (1)
- Council Lies (2)
- Government Corruption (1)
- Police (1)
- Sussex Police (1)
- Topics (1)
- Racist Councils (1)
Archives
- freemanpete: Magic This is great but!!!. If you succeed in demolishing the existing system, what do you replace [...]
- Ziggy: Hi I am glad to have found this site! I am currently battling Medway Council at the moment with rega [...]
- lostatsea61: ile definitely try :) also found out yesterday from my neighbour that when Medway council send you [...]
- admin: Wow - pity you couldn't that recorded - do you think its feasible to get that on tape? [...]
- mescalito: Hi, i posted the same information apart from the bit about whyte and co buying the debts on the lawf [...]
- Investigation launched into Freedom Rebels Gloucester Court Council Tax Video
- So much for recycling: Plymouth Council Binmen caught emptying ‘green’ bin and ordinary rubbish into the SAME lorry!!
- Council Whistleblower talks to www.NoCouncilTax.com about Councils Dirty Tactics.
- Snouts in the trough! After civil servants’ soaring pay, a 20% rise in their bonuses!
- The £18,000 council job you can’t apply for if you are white!
- West Sussex County Council Tell Us How To … Wash Our Hands!! (You’re Kidding Right?)
- Freeman in Gloucester Court 30th April 2010 – Another Council Tax Case Challenged!
- Chichester District Council Confronts Rebels Tearing Up The Council Tax Hearings …
- www.NoCouncilTax.com is back!!
- Taking The Kangaroo Courts Down One Council Tax Hearing At A Time!
FreedomRebels.co.uk
- Sheeple: Why They Are The Way They Are…
- Rise of the Archons(found link on Scottish Sovereigns)
- Tax Free 15 - Making a Stand Against Corrupt Banking and Taxation Systems
- The worlds going mad..USA oppression.
- UK Prime Minister David Cameron visits Common Purpose in Bangalore
- The Future is Being Written Right Now
- Profile of the Sociopath
- Does the judge thinks I'm crazy?
- The Mailbox: The Wellesley Watcher
- Gulf Oil volcano disaster and the false Global Economy
RaymondStClair.com
- Avon & Somerset Chief Constable faces jail for defying High Court
- Investigation launched into Freedom Rebels Gloucester Court video
- FreedomRebels.co.uk hits the 2000 Member mark – Worlds Largest FMOTL Social Network.
- Another Freeman Stands Up In Croydon Court … Whensa YOUR Dolmio Day???
- The Banking Scam … how it works!
- Peers petition Queen on Europe – ABOUT BLOODY TIME!
- Eirgi Occupation Of Anglo Irish Banks – Times Up For The Global Banking Elite!
- Gloucester Freemen & Freewomen Back In Court Challenging Council Tax!
- Australian Courts Now Being Challenged By Freemen – The People Of the World Are Rising Up
- Chichester District Council Confronts Rebels Tearing Up The Council Tax Hearings …
Norman Hinks
- Fraud team probes emails that link billionaire international Mr Fixit and Lord Mandelson
- Drivers clobbered: Fines could rocket to fill massive gap in Ministers' spending plans
- How Straw changed tune on rendition
- Paper trail points to Blair: Former PM 'sanctioned the abuse of UK citizens'
- Blair in secret talks with Gaddafi:
- Councils caught up in school building cuts fiasco prepare to sue after Gove gaffe (... and the build
- 'Too expensive' national census to be axed after 200 years
- David Cameron says coalition could even carry on after next election
- Why I'm certain my friend Dr Kelly was murdered
- Heavy cost: 2,000 incapacity claimants cost the taxpayer £10million a year because they are too fat
Recent Comments