After some extensive research we find that Tandridge District Council have an outstanding CCJ in the amount of £251.00 – yet this is the same Council that will have no hesitation in attempting to lock you up if you don’t pay their unlawful council tax.

Here’s the printout from Duport.co.uk (Companies House Made Easy).

We would encourage all local residents and in fact anyone who is concerned about this to drop a line to the following people at Tandridge District Council to ask those searching questions as to why this Council thinks its above the law and doesn’t have to pay County Court Judgements.

Brian Perkins

Chairman of the Tandridge District Council

Home Address:
Brambleside,
Newchapel Road,
Lingfield
Surrey
RH7 6BJ

Home Telephone:-
01342 832326

Email Address:-
Cllr.brian.perkins@tandridgedc.gov.uk

Tandridge District Council can’t complain about us putting these details when they put them out on their own website here

Stephen Weigel

Cheif Executive of Tandridge District Council

Office Address:
Tandridge District Council
8 Station Road East
Oxted
RH8 0BT

Telephone:-
01883 732701

Email Address:-
chiefexecutive’soffice@tandridge.gov.uk

Tandridge District Council can’t complain about us putting these details when they put them out on their own website here

So get in touch with Brian or Stephen and demand to know (in writing) why they feel its OK to ignore the CCJ they have against them while at the same time persecuting the local community to death over an unlawful charge!

Also, if anyone has any information regarding the CCJ Case, i.e. who it is in favour of or what its for then please get in touch – we would love to be able to collect on this debt and we have lawful mechanisms in place to do that.

The site that he’s talking about is of course “www.Nocounciltax.com” and he even tries to convince our caller that the decision made by Wirral Council to withdraw in the Roger Hayes case was made of “someones own back” and that “he wouldn’t like to be in her shoes”

What a load of tosh! – All decisions to withdraw from Council Tax cases are made by the councils own legal advisors who are all trained solicitors or barristers retained (At great expense to you and I) by the council. If the decision was made to withdraw by the council then it was made because they knew they were on a hiding to nothing! It’s that simple.

It’s staggering the depths these “legal departments” will go to and the lies they will tell just to try and get you to pay the council tax thats keeping them in a job.

Enjoy the call!

Bailiff accepts FEE SCHEDULE and sees unrebutted, uncontested and undiputed offer to pay in full in an acknowledged NOTICE in front of witnesses

The police need to be reminded that it is their responsibility to investigate allegations of serious fraud in public institutions, including councils.

Mr Mothersole, the Chief Executive, needs to be reminded that he has a duty to his council tax payers to ensure that council funds are used for the benefit of taxpayers, and not diverted into the bank account of secretive mind bending charities.

John Prentice can be contacted on 0844 798 4314
Sheffield Police can be contacted on 0114 2202020

So we are today broadcasting this very informative little film on how you should pay your council tax (that is … if you are still paying it).

Enjoy!

For years we have now been campaigning in a number of cases to get these corrupt councils to produce a “True and Original Copy” of one of these alleged “Liability Orders”.

Here’s the scam that the councils are trying to pull off!

1. They Issue a summons to you for not paying council tax.
2. When you go to court they try and trick you by meeting with you first in a little room to try and get you to admit “liability” for the council tax by getting you to agree to pay so much per month. This admission of liability on your part means that they can secure a “liability order” without you even entering the court!
3. If you don’t agree to pay then they issue a liability order anyway.
4. Now, our research shows that a “Proper Court Order” MUST have certain things on it and these are:
   1. A Wet ink Signature of the Judge or Justices Clerk who signed it on the day (Not a facsimilie signature)
   2. The Royal Identifier (i.e. Royal Coat Of Arms)
   3. Once the court date has passed they send a “Notice Of A Liability Order”

And this is where the scam exposes itself …

If the councils had a True and Original Liability Order (as per above) then why wouldn’t they send you a copy of that instead of sending you a piece of paper typed up on Microsoft Word claiming that they have a liability order.

A number of us have not been paying council for the last two years successfully because when challenged over this LAWFULLY because we back them into a corner! Here’s how …

1. We conditionally Accept their offer to pay council tax upon proof of claim (In other words they have to prove a number of points) – if they don’t we withold payment.
2. When they send a summons (Invitation to attend their place of business) we ignore it.
3. When they send a “NOTICE OF LIABILITY ORDER” we write back and send them a “NOTICE OF REBUTTAL” and “NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR TRUE AND ORIGINAL COPY OF COURT LIABILITY ORDER” which of course must meet the requirements stated earleir.
4. They then send in the bailiffs who we serve with bailiff packs (Download from www.freedomrebels.co.uk) and issue them with Bills for attending (we also video them and put them on youtube!)
5. Eventually the bailiffs get bored with that game and hand the thin back to the Council.
6. The council eventually send a letter telling you they will send you to court “for committal to prison” proceedings.
7. We then send them a letter which basically says this …

“If you are going to bring the matter into a criminal court and are going to rely on the alleged liability order in your case then the law and due process dictates that you must send me a copy of the TRUE and ORIGINAL LIABILITY ORDER, with all the correct attributes thereupon.

The law concerning disclosure dictates that you, the council, are required to do this at least 14 days before the hearing.

Therefore, if you are going to rely on this document we will bring it up in court that you have vexatiously withehld it at all times and therefore this matter and the valuable time of the court would not have been wasted and also because you, the council are required to disclose it 14 days before the hearing you will have no problem sending it to me now … will you?”

Normally at this point … the council go away because you have backed them into a corner lawfully. They know they can’t go into a court and rely on a piece of paper which …

BY THE ADMISSION OF PLYMOUTH COUNCIL … DOESN’T EXIST ON PAPER!

They also know that you are going to counter claim against them for being vexatious.

Here is the document from Plymouth Council telling us all that these Liability order are non existent!

So there you have it! Proof undeniable, from the council themselves that they don’t ACTUALLY have a Liability Order that conforms to any sort of Lawful requirement! And yet, on the back of this scam they creaming Billions from us all!

We believe that for this unlawful council tax abomination there is a truth in the words of Rutger Hauer’s character Roy Batty in the film Bladerunner!

“Time … To Die!”

Mark Bond allegedly owes two years’ council tax to Broadland District Council totalling £2,211.

But the 44-year-old, who calls himself a ‘Freeman-on-the-Land’ and goes under the name Mark of the Family Bond, does not accept he is liable to pay the council tax.

Yesterday he was dramatically arrested outside the magistrates’ court building as he took a cigarette break.

Police told him that he was under arrest and that he would be detained in the cells before he was brought before the judge later that day.

Before he was led to the cells, he asked police under what authority he was being arrested and handed them a notice of intent stating that he was no longer a UK citizen. He told police that the notice had already been handed to the Queen and prime minister David Cameron.

He then told police: “I will come peacefully but it’s under protest. I do not agree to this.”

He had earlier arrived at court under summons to face a charge of failure to pay his council tax.

Standing outside the entrance to Court No 2, he refused to enter until District Judge Philip Browning answered his question: “Can I enter this court with my God-given, inalienable rights intact?”

Mr Browning did not reply to the question so Bond declined to enter the court room.

Mr Browning then said that if Bond stayed outside he would deal with the case in his absence, and he issued a warrant for his arrest without bail.

Speaking to the Evening News outside the court building, Bond said that he was willing to go to jail for his beliefs.

The odd job man, who works from his home at Moulton St Mary, near Acle, said that he had paid taxes in the past, but had recently joined the ‘Freeman-on-the-Land’ group, which was a worldwide organisation of people who had revoked consent to be governed by human laws.

He said: “At no time have I refused to pay the council tax. I have written to Broadland for proof of the bill, but it has ignored my request and just said that ‘You are going to pay’.

“Today I asked the judge to walk into the court under common law and not commercial law. If I had entered under commercial law it would prove that I accepted its law. I was denied my rights to go in there.

“All councils and courts are private, profit-making organisations. and it’s all a money-making scam.”

Bond said that his partner, Beverley Clarke thought he was “mad” when he first told her of his new beliefs, but she had now accepted his views.

When he appeared in custody later in the day, representing himself, he accepted “under duress” that he owed the council tax money, but said that he had no income and did not claim any benefits, as he was no longer a UK citizen.

He was handed a suspended three-month jail sentence on condition that he pay £20 a week off the debt.

A Broadland Council spokesman said afterwards that Bond had sent several letters to the council asking for information about why he was liable to pay the council tax.

The council said that written replies had been made to all these letters, apart from the last, which was received on Tuesday. Because of the nearness to the court date, an officer telephoned Bond.

There were previous, preliminary court hearings in March and September to establish that Bond did owe the money, a council spokesman said.

Broadland’s local taxation manager, Simon Quilter, who prosecuted Bond in court, said: “Several officers have spoken to Mr Bond and explained the help he could re-ceive if he has trouble paying the bill, although we are not aware that this is the case. We will always try and help people if they have difficulty, but at the end of the day, if they choose not to pay, they will end up in court.”

According to the FMOTL.com website, being a freeman means freedom from police intimidation and harassment, freedom from law courts, and freedom from tax bills, etc.

It claims that a Freeman-on-the-land isn’t someone who remains outside the law, so it is not a proposition for anarchy.

The website continues: “But – it all depends on what is meant by ‘law’. And that’s the catch. What you have grown up to assume is ‘the law’ is not, in point of fact, the law. That’s The Grand Deception. Once you know the deception, and what the law actually is, you’ll realise how the wool has been firmly and deliberately pulled over your eyes.”

Freemen-of-the-land have previously challenged court cases across the country and some have even videotaped proceedings, posting the results on YouTube.

Take a look at this “alleged Liability Order” from Plymouth Council – really, you couldn’t make this stuff up. Unfortunately in this case Plymouth City Council have done just that!

We have known for a long time these “council Tax Hearings” are nothing more than “corporate meetings” paraded to you and I as “court Cases” – well the next time you get a summons – write to HMCS and ask them what they know about the case. The answer is … NOTHING!

That’s Odd? If these Council Tax Court Appearances were TRUE court cases then HMCS would know all about it. Instead they simply say “It’s a matter for the council” – well if thats the case then what the hell are these cases doing in a court???

Of course the reason the councils do this is obvious …

Ask yourself, if you had stopped paying council tax and they rang you up politely and asked you to go a meeting in the council offices … would you go? No and neither would the rest of us. So the councils “hire” the court which pays the magistrates to make bulk liability orders on the pretext that its a real court case.

Which it isn’t …

Which brings us onto the Liability Orders (allegedly) that these “courts” issue, these prove that these are NOT true courts and these liability orders are just made up bits of paper with no lawful meaning whatsoever.

Take a look at the image below and you will see the following major failings in this document.

1. No Royal Coat of Arms
2. No Seal of The Court (The stamp the clerk stamps the orders with)
3. No “wet ink” signature of the issuing magistrate or Clerk
4. Scribbled out / amended figures (are they making it up or what?)
5. No indication as to who the signatory is
6. No Name / Address of who the liability order is against
7. No date
8. No case number

Not only that, the document looks like it could have been created by any council employee who had been on a weeks course of Microsoft Word. To try and lay claim that this is a TRUE COURT order is laughable.

Many of us who are not paying this unlawful tax have been attempting to gain a true and original copy of a liability order issued and sealed by a court for over two years now and so far we have had NO success. We know why … it’s because the Councils DO NOT have such a document. There is NO court order. These “liability orders” are just corporate papwerwork created out of a corporate hearing and they know that when we push them into a TRUE court of law they will have to show which Judge and which Court produced the liability order (the true one) and as no court did … they will either have to admit

A) FRAUD
B) PERJURY (if they try and enter this Liability Order as a true court order)
C) ALL OF THE ABOVE!

Download a PDF copy of this document – CLICK HERE

For a more detailed expose of the fraud being visit:-

http://www.tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=13425&sid=d1e918b508323832657c618e85c5f0a5&start=10#p110402

ENTREPRENEUR Danny Bamping has said he would rather go to prison than pay his council tax in a dispute with the city council over student housing.

Mr Bamping, aged 36, has been ordered by a court to pay a year’s tax plus costs of £1,392.

He admitted to Plymouth magistrates he had not paid anything on his Band C house in Mutley since April – and that he would not pay anything.

Mr Bamping, the managing director of Bedlam Puzzles and Crazee Thingz who once appeared on the BBC’s Dragons’ Den, told the court it was unfair he should pay tax while the landlords of student properties are exempt.

He said his house in Hillside Avenue was in an area where there was a high concentration of student houses which caused disruption to other residents.

Mr Bamping, a father-of-three young daughters, added: “There are nearly 3,500 student properties in Plymouth exempt from paying council tax. If they were not exempt then that would be another £4.5 million coming into the city.”

He said if the national policy was reversed across the country, it would pay back ‘over £1 billion’ to the national debt.

Mr Bamping told the court: “The country is facing a lot of very difficult decisions, but reversing the exemption would be a relatively easy one.”

Plymouth City Council took Mr Bamping to court to force him to pay council tax for the last six months and also the coming six months.

The magistrates were advised they could not get involved in the rights and wrongs of council policy and had to grant a liability order if they thought he owed the money.

The bench granted an order for £1,392.37 for tax plus costs.

Mr Bamping was warned that if he did not pay he could be brought back to court for a committal warrant. He could then be sent to prison.

Mr Bamping said outside court he would not pay and was prepared to go to jail.

He said: “You have to make a stand. I don’t want this to be an idle threat.”

Credit: http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news/Entrepreneur-prepared-jail-tax-row/article-2903701-detail/article.html

Former accountant Traude Konig, 65, of Kingston Road, believes hired heavies have been abusive and illegally tried to gain entry to her house after she fell behind on her council tax by just six days.

The local authority can demand an entire year’s tax from anyone who falls behind on just one monthly payment, passing on their details to Merton Bailiffs Services – a separate organisation.

Miss Konig is adamant this breaches data protection rules and is also attempting to sue for the bailiffs’ alleged threatening behaviour.

She said: “I may be an old age pensioner but this isn’t right and I don’t want anyone thinking I’m a pushover.

“I want this to go to court so that the way Merton Council and its bailiffs operate is put out in the open.”

On one occasion she said she was forced to call police while fighting off a bailiff climbing into her home.

Miss Konig, who has professional legal experience, is now refusing to pay any further council tax, or the additional collection charges amounting to more than £1,000, until the matter has been resolved through the courts.

Chris Johnson, Merton Council head of audit and support and customer services, said: “If a resident falls behind with their council tax and the council has to take them to court, legally we can insist on full payment but this is not what we do.

“Instead we will look at each case and offer residents further opportunities to pay by instalments to ensure their situation is taken into account.

“When arrangements are broken, the case is passed to our in-house bailiff’s team who progress the matter in accordance with current relevant legislation.

“This policy is applied in all instances.”