The site that he’s talking about is of course “www.Nocounciltax.com” and he even tries to convince our caller that the decision made by Wirral Council to withdraw in the Roger Hayes case was made of “someones own back” and that “he wouldn’t like to be in her shoes”

What a load of tosh! – All decisions to withdraw from Council Tax cases are made by the councils own legal advisors who are all trained solicitors or barristers retained (At great expense to you and I) by the council. If the decision was made to withdraw by the council then it was made because they knew they were on a hiding to nothing! It’s that simple.

It’s staggering the depths these “legal departments” will go to and the lies they will tell just to try and get you to pay the council tax thats keeping them in a job.

Enjoy the call!

Take a look at this “alleged Liability Order” from Plymouth Council – really, you couldn’t make this stuff up. Unfortunately in this case Plymouth City Council have done just that!

We have known for a long time these “council Tax Hearings” are nothing more than “corporate meetings” paraded to you and I as “court Cases” – well the next time you get a summons – write to HMCS and ask them what they know about the case. The answer is … NOTHING!

That’s Odd? If these Council Tax Court Appearances were TRUE court cases then HMCS would know all about it. Instead they simply say “It’s a matter for the council” – well if thats the case then what the hell are these cases doing in a court???

Of course the reason the councils do this is obvious …

Ask yourself, if you had stopped paying council tax and they rang you up politely and asked you to go a meeting in the council offices … would you go? No and neither would the rest of us. So the councils “hire” the court which pays the magistrates to make bulk liability orders on the pretext that its a real court case.

Which it isn’t …

Which brings us onto the Liability Orders (allegedly) that these “courts” issue, these prove that these are NOT true courts and these liability orders are just made up bits of paper with no lawful meaning whatsoever.

Take a look at the image below and you will see the following major failings in this document.

1. No Royal Coat of Arms
2. No Seal of The Court (The stamp the clerk stamps the orders with)
3. No “wet ink” signature of the issuing magistrate or Clerk
4. Scribbled out / amended figures (are they making it up or what?)
5. No indication as to who the signatory is
6. No Name / Address of who the liability order is against
7. No date
8. No case number

Not only that, the document looks like it could have been created by any council employee who had been on a weeks course of Microsoft Word. To try and lay claim that this is a TRUE COURT order is laughable.

Many of us who are not paying this unlawful tax have been attempting to gain a true and original copy of a liability order issued and sealed by a court for over two years now and so far we have had NO success. We know why … it’s because the Councils DO NOT have such a document. There is NO court order. These “liability orders” are just corporate papwerwork created out of a corporate hearing and they know that when we push them into a TRUE court of law they will have to show which Judge and which Court produced the liability order (the true one) and as no court did … they will either have to admit

A) FRAUD
B) PERJURY (if they try and enter this Liability Order as a true court order)
C) ALL OF THE ABOVE!

Download a PDF copy of this document – CLICK HERE

For a more detailed expose of the fraud being visit:-

http://www.tpuc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=13425&sid=d1e918b508323832657c618e85c5f0a5&start=10#p110402

The Freedom Rebels have allegedly recorded a court hearing … THIS IS IT!

According to a local Gloucester Newspaper an allegedly illegal recording of a case at Gloucester Magistrates’ Court has been posted on the internet. (oh dear!)

The video was uploaded by a group calling itself The Freedom Rebels.

It shows a hearing which the group says took place on Friday, January 29, this year.

Making a recording in court is illegal under Section 41 of the Criminal Justice Act 1925 and under Section nine of the Contempt of Court Act 1981.

Anyone breaking the law can be jailed.

A police spokeswoman said: “Gloucester CID are currently investigating the filming of this footage.

“The court service are aware and we are liaising with them.”

The video has been uploaded to a well-known video sharing website.

It shows magistrates sitting in court two in the Barbican Way complex hearing a case regarding unpaid council tax.

The Freedom Rebels group claims to work to challenge what it calls the “false authority” of the courts.

Its members also believe council tax is illegal under British common law and are campaigning to see it abolished.

Videos of other court hearings, including at Cwmbran Magistrates’ Court, have also been uploaded onto the internet.

The law states: “It is a contempt of court to use in court, or bring into court for use, any tape recorder or other instrument for recording sound, except with the leave of the court or to publish a recording of legal proceedings made by means of any such instrument, or any recording derived directly or indirectly from it, by playing it in the hearing of the public.”

For Those who haven’t seen the video as yet …

1. Where HAVE you been?
2. Click Here - http://vimeo.com/channels/freedom

Credit: http://www.freedomrebels.co.uk/magazine/read/investigation-launched-into-freedom-rebels-gloucester-court-video_807.html

One person had time to grab their camera and took this image of a brown and a green bin being emptied into the vehicle.

And residents claim the practice has now been going on in Plymouth, Devon, for six weeks.

What a waste: Council workers look on as the two bins are emptied into the back of the same lorry

One man, who did not want to be named, said residents decided to take action after they complained to the council and received no response.

He said: ‘They just come along and get both bins and put them in the same truck. We wash our bottles and tins and we want them to be recycled.

‘It’s a waste of time if they are putting them in the same truck as the unrecyclable waste.

‘We saw it happen for the first time and thought it was a one-off, but now we have seen it again and again.’

The pictures were taken as the contracted refuse workers did their round in a service lane behind residents’ houses on Wednesday morning.

Those living on the street say they all adhere to the council’s recycling policy and are upset because they want to see the recyclable material kept separate.

They claim the same thing had happened on the past three green-and-brown bin collections, despite making complaints to the Plymouth City Council.

A female resident, who also asked to remain anonymous, took pictures of the incident and described what she saw as ‘terrible’.

She said: ‘I have always washed and separated out all my recyclable waste, but I’m not going to recycle any more until I am sure that the council is recycling it properly.’

She added that the council might say it was difficult to get lorries through – but if they could get one lorry through, they could get both a waste wagon and a recycling lorry in, she argued.

Plymouth City Council said that a ‘significant proportion’ of the green bins in the service lane had been contaminated with non-recyclable waste.

Therefore, in line with council policy, they were reclassified as ‘unrecyclable’ and emptied into a ‘brown’ refuse truck, a spokesman said.

‘A significant proportion of the green bins had also been “contaminated” with non-recyclable waste, so they were emptied into the same truck,’ he said.

‘Vehicles have been blocking access for our refuse and recycling trucks and we have had problems emptying the bins in this road for a number of weeks.

‘This meant there was a considerable build-up of rubbish and we received several complaints from residents that green and brown bins were overflowing.

‘Access was still blocked on Wednesday so we sent a crew in a smaller lorry to clear the rubbish as quickly as possible.

‘We can assure residents that they can keep up their excellent recycling efforts safe in the knowledge that it is all contributing to reducing landfill and creating a cleaner environment.’

Credit: http://www.freedomrebels.co.uk/members/profile/64/blog-view/blog_734.html